ksure
01-25 10:10 PM
( i dont know exactly but something i listened this )on h1 we should do the job continuously with out any gap. if one is not working on h1 for more than 180 days staying here is not legal or that may be out of staus.
like that who is on valid AOS(not primary applicant) dont want to do job means is there legality issues or out of status issues . is there any particular time limit for not doing job with AOS/EAD( not primary person). If i am wrong anything please correct me.
like that who is on valid AOS(not primary applicant) dont want to do job means is there legality issues or out of status issues . is there any particular time limit for not doing job with AOS/EAD( not primary person). If i am wrong anything please correct me.
wallpaper Bill Bellamy and wife
kirupa
04-08 02:06 AM
haha - that is really good ;) Adding it up in a few seconds!
dj.techo
04-04 07:28 PM
Hi All,
Me and my wife are on EAD. We want to open LLC. Right now I am doing consulting in IT firm. My wife is not working anywhere. What are TAX and immigration consequences if we open LLC on my wife's name?
Questions we have..
1. Can I become parnter easily once my status got changed from EAD to GC?
2. Once my wife start LLC, can she work for another company e.g. Software consulting?
3. What would be tax bracket for my owner of LLC?
Thanks,
dj
Me and my wife are on EAD. We want to open LLC. Right now I am doing consulting in IT firm. My wife is not working anywhere. What are TAX and immigration consequences if we open LLC on my wife's name?
Questions we have..
1. Can I become parnter easily once my status got changed from EAD to GC?
2. Once my wife start LLC, can she work for another company e.g. Software consulting?
3. What would be tax bracket for my owner of LLC?
Thanks,
dj
2011 Lee DeWyze, Nigel Lythgoe,
tatyavinchu
09-17 11:54 AM
I am a july 07 filer with EB2 PD Oct 2005. I switched employers in early part of this year. My employer has been very erratic and not paying me salary for past 2 months because his money is not cleared from his client. I have found another contract but my employer wants to wait until his money is cleared before he can pay me and that can take longer than 6 months !!! (if his money is not cleared before)
Under such circumstances I am jeopardising everything. I was wondering if I start working for my own company on a W2 with a same job profile same salary structure will USCIS consider this as something fraudulent or do they allow self employment under AC21 ? After I have my GC I plan to continue working for my own company. In that case what do I need to do from my side to make this happen ? I started my company in August 2008.
Under such circumstances I am jeopardising everything. I was wondering if I start working for my own company on a W2 with a same job profile same salary structure will USCIS consider this as something fraudulent or do they allow self employment under AC21 ? After I have my GC I plan to continue working for my own company. In that case what do I need to do from my side to make this happen ? I started my company in August 2008.
more...
ckichannagari
05-20 10:34 AM
Dear Administrator,
could you pl give donor access.
Paypal Transaction ID: 7GB56304CH022333C
Thank you
could you pl give donor access.
Paypal Transaction ID: 7GB56304CH022333C
Thank you
lotsofspace
12-31 01:34 PM
??
Just added. You are too quick :) :)
For some reason I could not add the poll options until I submit the message.
Just added. You are too quick :) :)
For some reason I could not add the poll options until I submit the message.
more...
alex99
09-14 04:33 PM
^^^^^^^^
2010 nigel lythgoe so you think you
desi3933
06-18 03:38 PM
Hi,
Suppose the 485 is filed for a position (salary 70K). When using AC21, does the salary in the new company matters? Suppose if its 110K?
Also, does the title matter? Do we need to get the exact job title in the new company?
It may be one the criteria to check if the new job is same or similar.
Please check and verify details with your attorney/lawyer. This is NOT a legal advice.
----------------------------------
Permanent Resident since May 2002
Suppose the 485 is filed for a position (salary 70K). When using AC21, does the salary in the new company matters? Suppose if its 110K?
Also, does the title matter? Do we need to get the exact job title in the new company?
It may be one the criteria to check if the new job is same or similar.
Please check and verify details with your attorney/lawyer. This is NOT a legal advice.
----------------------------------
Permanent Resident since May 2002
more...
kirupa
01-11 09:43 PM
Many of the Windows Live apps (Writer, Messenger, etc.), Windows Server Add-Ins/Components, Expression, and a handful that I can't remember use .NET either exclusively or just for the UI.
With .NET you still have the ability to make OS-level calls using the platform invoke methods. Here is an example where I showed how to do that: http://blog.kirupa.com/?p=256
:)
With .NET you still have the ability to make OS-level calls using the platform invoke methods. Here is an example where I showed how to do that: http://blog.kirupa.com/?p=256
:)
hair Dance: Nigel Lythgoe amp; Mia
hope4gc
04-07 11:07 PM
Thank you Desi3933
I feel better that i know the facts and Plan accordingly.
I feel better that i know the facts and Plan accordingly.
more...
roseball
01-27 04:28 PM
Immigration & Winning the Future | The White House (http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/01/27/immigration-winning-future)
I quote:
"We have also improved our legal immigration system by reducing backlogs of immigration applications and devoting critical funding to promote innovative citizenship preparation and integration programs in communities throughout the country."
Any idea what they are talking about in terms of backlog reduction?
Cases waiting for visa numbers are not considered as backlogged. USCIS only terms cases pending processing as backlogged cases.
I quote:
"We have also improved our legal immigration system by reducing backlogs of immigration applications and devoting critical funding to promote innovative citizenship preparation and integration programs in communities throughout the country."
Any idea what they are talking about in terms of backlog reduction?
Cases waiting for visa numbers are not considered as backlogged. USCIS only terms cases pending processing as backlogged cases.
hot nigel lythgoe and lady gaga.
meridiani.planum
12-14 05:49 PM
Our AP saga got its final miracle today. (at least I think it’s the final one…) Though my spouse’s and daughter's AP were finally got approved yesterday, the miracle is that TSC has decided to expedite and overnight them, based on a fax from my father-in-law’s doctor.
The very nice lady IO at SF INS office this morning asked for our telephone numbers, and then followed up and called us on our cell phone to confirm that TSC is expediting the APS…..…and overnight-ing them!
Prior to this last miracle the journey was choppy.
We are to leave for India on Dec 26th... ..the APs were e-filed on July 12 to give TSC enough time.
Because nothing seemed to be happening I faxed TSC director (no use), another fax at TSC (not much use), made friends with a TSC rep...(great) got in touch with my Congressman George MIller's office..(fantastic), leading to the approval yesterday and then today comes the icing on the cake… the overnight-ing….
After a season of dryness, it doesn't just rain, it pours!
write to the ombudsman. So much circus for an AP? When you applied 5 months ago!!
oh, and congrats on getting your AP in time for your travel plans.
The very nice lady IO at SF INS office this morning asked for our telephone numbers, and then followed up and called us on our cell phone to confirm that TSC is expediting the APS…..…and overnight-ing them!
Prior to this last miracle the journey was choppy.
We are to leave for India on Dec 26th... ..the APs were e-filed on July 12 to give TSC enough time.
Because nothing seemed to be happening I faxed TSC director (no use), another fax at TSC (not much use), made friends with a TSC rep...(great) got in touch with my Congressman George MIller's office..(fantastic), leading to the approval yesterday and then today comes the icing on the cake… the overnight-ing….
After a season of dryness, it doesn't just rain, it pours!
write to the ombudsman. So much circus for an AP? When you applied 5 months ago!!
oh, and congrats on getting your AP in time for your travel plans.
more...
house along with Nigel Lythgoe,
bekugc
08-06 05:39 PM
whether you are in h1 or h4, it is important you maintain 'good standing' of whatever status you are in. if u dont have a job, change to H4, so that ur earlier h1 record remains clean (as long as u had H1, u got paid and have proof of pay /employment experience)
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
when you get ur offer down the line, if that company sponsors h1 for you, at that time theyll collect ur experience letters and proof and go for the H1. if the h1 sponsor is a different company, Im do not really think it is treated as a "renewal" since ur status as H1 has ended when u changed to H4. It may be treated as a "fresh h1 sponsor/transfer" for you.
However, you do not have to worry about the annual h1 quota in ur case even tho u have lost ur H1 status. you are included in the exception clause - "Those beneficiaries not subject to the annual quota are those who currently hold H-1B status or have held H-1B status at some point in the past six years and have not been outside the United States for more than 365 consecutive days"
so basically, according to me, if ur employment record is clean and if the new sponsor's requirements meets proper H1 guidelines, you can get back on H1.
im not an attorney..so the regular warning applies!
tattoo Dance guru Nigel Lythgoe.
Munna Bhai
07-12 09:59 AM
I don't think you can delete just close it.. so that no one will post it again in this thread., you can see the close button if you are the owner of this thread.
Thanks
admin, please close this thread, I already opened another one. I don't know how to do!
Thanks,
Thanks
admin, please close this thread, I already opened another one. I don't know how to do!
Thanks,
more...
pictures Lythgoe, 60, divorced wife
syedajmal
01-28 11:46 PM
I am in a similar situation and need to travel. Applied for my AP on Apr/20/2010. I have put in an expedited request a week ago but still no response. Just booked an Infopass appointment for Feb/04/2011. Wanted to make it is fine and any suggestions on what I should carry with me.
Thanks in advance,
-Syed
Thanks in advance,
-Syed
dresses producer Nigel Lythgoe,
Sleepless_in_Seattle
08-08 12:42 PM
Hi ChainReaction,
Look into the discussions in my thread "Transferring Companies after I-140 approval" and the possibbilities are discussed clearly. In fact, I consulted a lawyer out of my own interests and posted the outcome.
Hope it helps.
Sleepless_in_Seattle
Look into the discussions in my thread "Transferring Companies after I-140 approval" and the possibbilities are discussed clearly. In fact, I consulted a lawyer out of my own interests and posted the outcome.
Hope it helps.
Sleepless_in_Seattle
more...
makeup nigel lythgoe young
ssdtm
12-12 08:43 PM
Did you ever used EAD? Just getting an EAD does not mean you were on EAD.
Also AP does not invilidate your H1. If you are working with the H1 sponsoring employer and never used EAD, then you need not worry.
Also AP does not invilidate your H1. If you are working with the H1 sponsoring employer and never used EAD, then you need not worry.
girlfriend 2011 Dance guru Nigel Lythgoe.
jliechty
June 18th, 2005, 04:14 AM
In general, macro lenses around 100mm are good for most kinds of macro photography. They have too much working distance for use on a copy stand, and not quite enough for skittish and/or dangerous insects or small animals. For general purpose stuff, the angle of view is such that you get enough background isolation to be worthwhile (you can rotate around your subject just a bit to get a highlight out of the background, while a 50mm macro takes in more background and makes this difficult).
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.
I got a used Tamron 90mm, and let's just say that the build quality does not inspire confidence - however, the image quality is excellent. From what little I've seen of the Sigma 105mm macro (and from the many images that the members here have posted), it appears to have a bit better build quality and fine image quality as well. The Nikon macro is not going to be much better, if at all, in image quality than these, and you will pay dearly for the brand name. The one macro lens to avoid, however, is a "Phoenix" macro that only goes to 1:2 (that means that you can't get enough magnification for most small insects and flowers to fill the frame) and is most likely more cheaply built than my Tamron. Almost every other macro lens goes to 1:1 these days, and you can get the nicer ones used from KEH for not much more, so there's no reason to buy not-so-ideal lenses that you'll outgrow in no time anyway.